Keeping Links in the Security Chain Strong

By Steven E. Rindner

Executive Vice President

Kastle Systems International

To address tenant concerns and demands surrounding security during the past few years, many building owners hired experts to recommend access control and security systems, invested in the latest systems and components, and augmented their security staffs. Over time, however, tenant priorities evolved, security and administrative personnel turned over, and new operational challenges arose. Unfortunately, several years later, the buildings’ static security systems are inflexible and impractical for tenant use. In making the initial investment, owners and property managers relied solely upon great technology to deliver a total security solution, unaware they also needed to plan for ongoing system management (programming. operations. administration, changes/upgrades, and monitoring). The “technology solution” did not address the ongoing management of the system and lacked the necessary functionality, flexibility and continuity to be effective over time. Confronted by the looming possibility they will be forced to abandon their investment, owners and property managers are experiencing a gap in their expectations between technology and functionality. This gap can be bridged by professional ongoing system management.

The Three Links in the Security Chain

Electronic access control and security may be compared to a chain that is only as strong as the weakest link. The security “chain” includes initial system integration, ongoing system management. and maintenance. The initial system integration segment of the chain includes design and installation, and consists of a customized needs assessment, threat analysis, and evaluation of security system options. The installation then delivers functionality through highly efficient off-the-shelf components tailored to unique building needs. However, purchasing only the first segment of the chain – initial design and installation – yields neither a comprehensive nor effective solution.

The middle link of the security chain encompasses ongoing system management: ongoing programming, operations, administration, changes/upgrades, and monitoring. This second of the system link incorporates responsibilities such as administering access cards, ensuring building system performance, managing redundant telephones, software, and manpower, coordinating multiple vendors, creating tailored response procedures, and specifying exception events. It also encompasses human resources responsibilities, such as covering for vacationing personnel, training operators, and establishing tenant protocols. To be effective, a system must be continuously and proactively monitored 24/7 1365 with protocols in place to address any situation or emergency that may arise. Conditions such as temperature, flood, smoke, and equipment failure must be monitored, as well as building perimeter and interior doors. Programming. backing-up the system, delivering preventive maintenance, and updating hardware/software round out the operational aspects of this vital, but often neglected middle segment of the security chain.

Preventive maintenance and service of hardware comprise the third and final link in the security chain. Warranties are imperative, but there is no substitute for having a knowledgeable professional on call.

All three segments of the security chain must be continuously provided to make the system function in a meaningful way. Building owners typically outsource the first and third links in the security chain to professionals, but generally perform in-house the most critical link – ongoing system management – leaving themselves vulnerable to the risk of the everwidening gap between the technology they bought and the functionality they sought to achieve. Owners who have been successful bridging that gap have outsourced ongoing system management to professionals.

The Critical Middle Link-Ongoing System Management: In-House or Outsource?

Owners have a choice regarding the ongoing operation and management of their system. They can assume the responsibility and liability by managing it in-house, or they can outsource the responsibility and liability of system management to professionals. With basic evaluation, it is evident that staffing these ongoing functions in-house is not practical or cost-effective.

Owners most likely will hire an expert for the design, a sub-contractor for the installation and a vendor to perform the initial programming of the system. Ongoing system management is even more essential, but it is often overlooked when a system is designed and deployed. Building engineers will be needed to tackle operations, administrative personnel in the building manager’s office will be tasked with the task of card administration, and security guards will respond to emergencies and monitor alarms. Because of the special nature of the equipment involved, service and maintenance of the electronic access and security system will most likely be handed off to yet another subcontractor. And what happens when tenants request changes to the system or equipment needs to be upgraded? Most likely another consultant is summoned. and the process begins again.

Outsourcing ongoing system management requires fewer in-house personnel and is significantly less expensive than creating a self-managed system. Over the life of a security system, owners experience dramatic savings in operating costs and achieve additional savings through the more efficient use of staff. Outsourcing also reduces the risk of potential legal liability; hiring an expert to ensure the system is current and functional mitigates such risks.

Conclusion: The Benefits of Outsourcing Ongoing System Management

Owners typically rely on outside security professionals for the first and last links of the system chain (initial system integration and maintenance). Owners should also consider outsourcing the critical middle link – ongoing system management. Relying on security professionals for ongoing system management provides the experience, infrastructure, expertise and technical capabilities to secure a building: experts do a better job because security is their core business, thus permitting a building owner’s focus to shift from managing resources and issues to managing results. Also, it guarantees a reduction in costs and establishes a team of experts with the ability to adjust quickly to new developments and constantly changing technology, devices and threats. Professional ongoing system management eliminates the gap in expectations between technology and functionality. It ensures an owner receives the functionality, flexibility, and continuity of an effective, cost-efficient, long-term security solution.

Reprinted with permission from the Real Estate Weekly. 2005, all rights reserved. Reprinted by Scoop ReprintSource l-800-767 -3263

Stay informed.
Subscribe to our updates.

Stay updated on the latest security trends and technology, including our KastleWatch newsletter, news, virtual events, and promotions.